There is a world of homiletically undeveloped ethics here. The
Spirit of the world has made off with these ethical opportunities while we have
been reviewing our basic historic doctrines for the umpteenth time, lest we
make those dreadful errors of the fifteenth century church. We may need a
second Reformation to redress our neglect in these matters. We can rebuke
Johannes Tetzel’s errors while tolerating those of Charles Darwin in our very
pulpits. We acknowledge the Puritan iconoclasts in our history while tolerating
the worship of nature in environmentalism. Aaron’s calf today would not be
golden, but green. We recognize the reprehensible militancy of the late medieval
Church but not the military hubris of our own present empire. In economics we
know that Scripture says our silver has become dross; we understand that in an
abstract way, but not one Christian in a hundred could connect that ultimate
revelation with the proximate statement of Gresham’s law and its illustration
in 1965 when silver coins disappeared from circulation as dross coins were
introduced. We can recite, “Render unto Caesar ... and render unto God,” but
have surrendered nearly everything to Caesar since we have had no explicit
instruction in discerning the difference in the claims. We have a catechism
which tells us to preserve life by all lawful means, but leave Christians on
their own when faced with feeding tubes and desperate surgical options at the
tail end of the life span. Christians sit on juries deciding the fate of a
parent charged with the crime of spanking his child. Their uneasiness has no
focus. They have never been taught about jury nullification or the relevant
history of William Penn in this regard.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Practical Preaching, Please
The church needs to dare to engage its preaching with the
material world as it is connected to the spiritual world. It needs to cease
exclusive fixation with our inner spiritual/psychic states and gaze outward
from time to time at the creation and the links of causation that emerge into
our view as more or less proximate to actions. We need robust teaching on
matters of practice wherein second causes are not despised, but established. Liberals
so-called want to make sin into mere system error; we are basically okay, but
our environments are the problem, especially the social environment. We make an
opposite error; we want the heart to be changed but make no development of its
interaction with the material and social world.
Labels:
Theology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment